The project presented several complex challenges:  (1) a unique core and shell design forced cinema operation and design teams to work within the confines of a fixed footprint design,  (2) effective communication on a technical level do to language differences, (3) inability of face-to-face interaction because of geographical dispersion, and (4) tracking and coordination difficulties due to time zone differences.

Recognizing the importance of mutual understanding between both teams, emphasis was placed on communication.  By developing a common communication strategy, the distance and time difficulties were overcome in the process.  The plan focused on:

• Structured conference calls
• Daily e-mail communication
• Electronic transfer of CAD files, and
• Regular monthly on-site workshop meetings

With a predetermined agenda, the monthly visits reinforced the team's commitment to move the project forward. It allowed resolution of open issues that could not have been resolved without face-to-face interaction and open dialog to understand the subtleties of important concern's.

The unique design also presented the biggest risk from an operational and business perspective.  It was critical to convey the cinema technical and operational requirements to the developer's team, for inclusion in the overall plan in a timely fashion.  Layout efficiency and long term maintenance requirements were a major economic concern.  To mitigate this risk, several steps were taken.  Among them:

• Retained MJM Architects with cinema and international experience to lead the design team
• Developed technical scope of work document, clearly outlining responsibilities for coordination and execution
• Early tender of cinema FF&E package
• Recruited local project management resources to execute FF&E fit-out